Total Pageviews

Translate

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Indoor Soccer


I am preparing to go to my Indoor Soccer game at the Rockville Sportsplex. Indoor soccer is very different from outdoor, which I play in the spring and fall. My MSI Classic team finished in 2nd place last outdoor, season, but are 1 and 2 so far indoors. We are playing against college students, so our struggles are probably justified.

Indoor soccer is a way faster game than outdoor. But the main difference is the rules. First of all, there are no out of bounds unless the ball hits the high ceiling. The walls are not only used to keep the ball in play but also to serve as a way to pass. The fields are by estimate about 3/5 the size of a regulation field. The games are on fake turf and is played 6 on 6. Substitutions happen the same way as they do in hockey: during play, unlike outdoors when the play must be dead to make changes.

As you can see by the picture, the spectators can watch from either the ground floor or the second floor.

I'm mostly a field player but I do occasionally play goalie. They are both fun. This fast paced game forces me to be on alert every second I'm in the game. Also, it makes keeping possession much harder. There's rarely time to hold onto the ball and wait for teammates to get home. In a split second, an opponent will pick your pocket.

I've played indoor for five years now and the game has changed drastically over that time. For one thing, shots are much harder and with so few players on the field, players get many looks at goal. Also, players can kick the ball all the way across the field in the air.

The shortened field and the fast paced action lead to exciting and usually high-scoring games.

    


Monday, December 17, 2012

Documentary Review


The Presidents: Truman to Ford 1945-1977

As one can probably tell from the title, the documentary is about the presidencies from Truman to Ford.

Truman was not well known when he became vice-president, and was not too popular when he became president after Roosevelt’s death. Nonetheless, this Democrat was the president of the United States. Many people admired his willingness to act against the wishes of the people to do what he believed was best. Truman’s first decision was to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Many people respected him for doing so. Truman dealt with the struggle to fend off communism. He created the policy of containment. Truman also made steps to end racial segregation. He left office unpopular but in hindsight, many people appreciated him.

Dwight Eisenhower was an American military hero. He did not like how the U.S. handled the Korean War, so he decided to run for president as a Republican. The narrator called the slogan “We like Ike” as an American sentiment. Eisenhower started getting the U.S. involved in the Vietnam conflict. He sent money to South Vietnam. Eisenhower won reelection with ease. He got a heart attack that made him seem weak. When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik into space, many Americans thought America was losing out to the Soviet Union. Eisenhower, at the end of his presidency, lost some of his “grand-father figure.”

John F. Kennedy was a Democrat the youngest man ever elected president. His generation was the youth of America. Everyone loved Kennedy. He suffered from many illnesses. Kennedy had an open-door policy. His failure with the Bay of Pigs changed him as a president. His audacity led him to challenging the nation, saying that the U.S. would land a man on the moon by the end of the decade. Kennedy’s biggest decision came during the Cuban Missile Crisis. He ordered a naval blockade of Cuba, which turned out to be a good decision. Tragically Kennedy was murdered not even one three years into his presidency. Despite his shortened term, he is still a famous president. 

Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson was sworn into office and promised to fulfill Kennedy’s presidency. LBJ had an ego problem, and often overreacted. He had an “in-your-face” style. It was arguably a gesture of dominance. Johnson’s Great Society created many new laws. This included the Civil Rights Act. In domestic policies, many people respect him. But he lost lots of it because of how he escalated the war in Vietnam. He did try to reach peace with Vietnam at the end of his presidency, but it was too little too late. Under fire, Johnson decided not to run for reelection.

Richard Nixon did a lot of scheming to become president. Nixon, a Republican, pretended that he had a plan to end the war, but in reality, he was only trying to escalate it. He used his presidency to go after enemies and gain celebrity status. While Nixon lied and lied, Watergate started heating up. The House passed an article of impeachment, and resigned immediately. He was a good strategist but will always be seen as a criminal.

Gerald Ford, Nixon’s Republican vice-president, took over president for Nixon. He was an inexperienced president. He tried to aid South Vietnam, but Congress did not allow it. Ford will always be associated with Nixon, which resulted in him not getting reelected.

What stood out to me in this documentary were the cinematic aspects. There was some great B-roll footage, and I always felt engaged. They had interviews and never had the narrator speak over black and rarely even pictures. There was sometimes music over interviews, which made them a little more lively.

There were no dramatic aspects present in the film. All the viewer sees are B-rolls and interviews.

The literary aspects were also impressive in the documentary. The plot was very well organized, in that the director used the obvious organization given: the presidents in chronological order. This saved me potential confusion because I knew that until the next president was introduced, the film was still describing the same one. The story was told in the third-person, and in a very unbiased way. At times I was bothered by how they were a little too acknowledging of a president’s positives. The documentaries recap of Nixon, for example, included it saying something like, “He was a very strategic man.” From the events the film described, he lied a trillion times, he escalated the Vietnam War when he said he’d end it, and he resigned after being found a criminal. I don’t know how he deserves a positive concluding statement.

A voice over narration was used. We never saw the narrator, but he played a huge part in the documentary.

The documentary used the Ken Burns effect, but not like I’d ever seen it before. They zoomed all around a wide image focusing on each individual piece. I have to say, it was pretty cool.

I would recommend this documentary if one wants pure facts. For me, I liked the truths of it, but if it had been a little biased I probably would have preferred it. Whether or not it took a Liberal or Conservative stance, I would have still been able to see a viewpoint. From this video, all I got were facts, given in a very enticing manner.  

 

Friday, December 14, 2012

Documentary Project

I'm working with Jacob and Jasper on a documentary project about what we feel Obama should do about the conflict in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Out of the three of us, I'm definitely the least knowledgeable on the topic. But I am quickly learning, and have a better understanding of the current conflict as well as the history. I've made several note cards on Noodletools already.


I do have experience with documentaries as I made two in 8th grade, one on sleep, which I did with a group, and one on exercise, which I made on my own. I will be useful when it comes to the format of a short documentary.

We have a couple of interviews scheduled. One with Mr. Freeman and one with some dude who has prominence and some position that is hard to remember the name of.

Right now there's not much else to say. We're using Freeman's interview to help guide our script. Not my choice but I'm not going to argue against the other two who like that idea. Not a big deal, that approach should work fine.


Monday, December 10, 2012

I'm Stupid

I missed my post due by December 9th and I feel stupid.


It's a simple reflection due once a week and I blew it. This was unfortunate as well, because I had recently posted two or three posts that hadn't been graded. I guess that's luck of the draw. I hope this won't affect me in the long run because it was a mistake, and this was an exception to my normally consistent posts.

Remembering to do the assignment is key, so I've set two alarms for Friday and Sunday to remind me to post, just in case I forget, like in this instance. When I have an interesting post, I will probably not need the reminder. Last week I had an interesting topic on plagiarism and posted that immediately.

As I was going over ways to update my Blog, I found the "Monetize" setting. Should I do it??? If I kept this Blog running by the end of the century maybe I'll have some money sent in the mail. Can't say I'm a hit. Maybe it's because of posts like these.

Well... so long.


Tuesday, November 27, 2012

My First Experience With Copyright Infringment

Last year, at the end of units in U.S. History class, we had to do Student Initiated Assignments. We could choose any topic related to the unit we had just covered. Then we could put together any kind of presentation we wanted. At the end of the Gilded Age unit, I decided to make a short documentary video on Andrew Carnegie. It only included pictures, text slides, music, and voice overs, but doing research on Carnegie, capturing audio, and editing took around three hours as I recall. After I finished, I uploaded it to Youtube, sent the link to my teacher, and never returned to the video again...

That is, until Thanksgiving weekend, when I got a message from a stranger. The person wrote: "Hi There. Can you tell me what software you used to build your video? I am impressed and would like to use it too." At first I was very confused, because I didn't even realize I had allowed the public to view my video. Then it dawned on me that I had actually made an informative and reasonably catchy video that could benefit students trying to learn more about Carnegie, and others who are curious to see what people on Youtube have to say about him. For the first time in just over a year, I decided to check out my video. I watched it and realized that I had made it for entertainment purposes, so I created a couple of unnecessary text slides. While I was mocking my rather stupid intro, I looked down at my view count. I over nearly 450 views! While this is a tiny number relative to the millions some videos get, I haven't uploaded a video with nearly this many hits. 

Then I thought, This silly first ten seconds takes away from this otherwise interesting documentary. I remembered we were taught about a Youtube video editor in this class. I figured out this basic software in a couple minutes and removed a little from the beginning and end. The new edits are finalized and the old version can no longer be seen by anyone but me, I assumed. Here it is (by the way, hitting the "Like" button wouldn't hurt):



I wanted to see if my video would be high on the list of search results. First I searched "Andrew Carnegie" and I was able to find my video on the third page of results. Not bad, I'd say, considering that Andrew Carnegie is one of the most prominent figures in American history. Next I tried "Vertical Integration," where my video was fifth on the first page. Finally, I typed in "Andrew Carnegie Vertical Integration," and my video appeared first on the list. Right under it, however, was a video with a cover picture of stacks of money, a picture which looked awfully similar to the one I used in my video. I clicked on it, and sure enough, somebody reuploaded my video. This one came before the edits so if you want to see the outtakes, you may:


I messaged the user and requested that they take down the video, and I filed a copyright claim to Youtube. It did anger me that somebody would plagiarize my video and take credit for it, but at the same time, I do see it as a compliment because somebody thought it was good enough to want to take credit for. They seem to have been doing an Andrew Carnegie series based on their channel's videos. I filed this claim on Saturday, Novermber 24, so I expect Youtube to take action soon.

Update: So, as you probably saw, the video had been removed by Youtube! Too bad you won't get to see the intro now.

Sunday, November 18, 2012

CAP Congress


I will admit that while I did not have a blast during the week of CAP Congress, I thought I was a good learning experience. I realized how difficult it is for a bill to become a law. Even in CAP which seems to be almost entirely liberal, it was still not easy to pass bills. The food MOCWAS brought in on Wednesday represents the bigger idea that bill sponsors will do everything they can to get their bills passed. In Congress, it was difficult to do something with all six bills in two days. We did not really have time to focus on each word of each bill, but there were clearly loopholes, which swayed my vote. At least once I would have voted differently if more time had been spent improving the bill. I was bored because rarely was a vote in doubt, even on amendments. Nonetheless, I now have a better idea of how Congress works and how every little word in a bill can be subject to debate.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

The Real Fall













Today I biked on the Capital Crescent Trail and got a great chance to see fall. Too bad I didn't have any kind of camera with me, because it was a nice ride. I don't know if it's just me, but I feel as though trees are losing their leaves at a wide range of times. When I did my "Capture the Fall" video, I was having some difficulty finding many leaves. Some trees still had all their leaves. But then some had no leaves at all. In the areas with many trees, leaves were coming down everywhere, including on my head. In hindsight, this weekend would have probably been a better time to make my video.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Capture the Fall


I created my "Capture the Fall" video by going around and taking short (usually around 10 seconds) shots. I tried to bring them to life a bit by moving around, just so that it wouldn't be a still frame collage. I took shots of everything that could relate in any way to fall, or even the outdoors for that matter. The flower I briefly showed in it does not really relate specifically to fall, but I thought it was a nice shot to include. I took shots from different heights as well, to "Capture the Fall" from different perspectives. My favorite shot was dropping the iPhone, which I used to film the video, into the leaves. Until I put it into iMovie and slowed it down as much as possible, I did not know how it would look. I elected to leave background sound in just because of the crunch sound of leaves. I ended up with well over a minute of footage, and had to leave out some shots and cut some short.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Local Passion

THE BLACKOUT RETURNS
I've been waiting for five years now! DC United is finally back in the playoffs!

I've never thought Major League Soccer was one of the best soccer leagues in the world, nor have I thought DC United was one of the best clubs in the world, but I have been a fan of this team for about eight years. While I have started to pay more attention to the English Premier League and a little less to the MLS, I've stayed attached to United. The reason for this is the local passion. Soccer is hardly recognized in the U.S., and most people who do enjoy soccer keep up with international teams and leagues, and understandably so, as the quality is significantly higher. But this is what keeps me a fan of United. There is a section of fans in RFK Stadium, who spend entire games singing and jumping. Sometimes I'm right it, sometimes I by my TV. The fans have so much passion, but so do the players. Few individuals in the league are making enough money to be set for life. What most of these players are after is not a celebrity status or tons of money, they want to pursue the game they love. A

As you can see by what I wrote, I still to this day don't know exactly why I love DC United so much. All I know is there is something about the passion of the players and the fans, which makes supporting this team very exciting.

Friday, October 26, 2012

Poem: The Color Blue

The Color Blue
A Masterpiece By Ross
Blue, Blue, O wonderful blue
The color of the sky
The color of the ocean
The color... of blue cheese.

There are so many shades of this wonderful color
There's light blue
Dark blue
The color of jeans (assuming they're blue jeans)

Blue, a powerful color
A primary color
A color that can help make others

What you saw there was Blue
Blue doing what it does best
Blue acting unselfishly
Blue wanting to bring more colors into this world
Blue, just being blue

If you are ever feeling blue
Just remember: blue is feeling you
Its complimenting you on your selflessness
Telling you: while you may not appreciate yourself at the time, others do.

Blue, Blue, O mighty color blue
You always know what to do
You turn me green when I have the flu (best line right there)
You even help me tie my shoe. (rhyme)

Blue...
Blue...
How could I live without you? 

Sunday, October 21, 2012

[President]-isms

This week, during the presidential debate, Mitt Romney delivered a classic. Responding to a question on pay equality for women, Romney said that while assembling his cabinet after being elected governor in Massachusetts, he was not pleased to see that his staff only sent him male applicants. He then proceeded to talk about his response. "I went to a number of women's groups and said, 'Can you help us find folks,' and they brought us whole binders full of women." This binder must have been pretty cramped. 

Romney's gaffe inspired me to search for some occasions in which other U.S. officials have misspoken.

Ronald Reagan on his recent trip: "Well, I learned a lot....I went down to (Latin America) to find out from them and (learn) their views. You'd be surprised. They're all individual countries."

Here's a map of Latin America:
Latin America includes Mexico and all of South America
As I'm guessing you can see, there are multiple countries in this image. What amazes me is that it took Reagan a trip to Latin America to figure that out. And we can't forget that this president was best-known for his foreign policy. I wonder if he thought he was ending a Cold War with all of Asia. 

Here's another one from Mr. Reagan: "Trees cause more pollution than automobiles."


I was going to just let this one speak for itself, but then I found this image describing Reagan's claim:
This tree is breathing out CO2












 
Here's a quote from Joe Biden, which, at first glance, may not seem too bad. He was introducing Missouri state Senator Chuck Graham: "Stand up, Chuck, let 'em see ya."

The only problem with this is that Graham happens to be in a wheelchair. I will give some props to Biden, however, as he did manage to recover from his blunder and give the man a warm welcoming. Take a look:


Just a little slip up from Joe Biden, nothing too bad. Still, it's quite funny: "The next President of the United States — Barack America!" It's a lot funnier of video:

Last up, one of the best gaffers of all time, Mr. George W. Bush. I'm going to pick a couple of my favorite from a long line of Bushisms.

On the topic of teaching to a test, Mr. Bush goes off, but unfortunately for him, what looked to be his most powerful line, turned out to be a topic of jokes for years to come: "You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test."

Clearly having good grammar isn't a requirement to pass literacy tests. Here's a short video compilation of Bush on education (this quote is included):

 
Here's another Bush quote and it's a doozy: "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country."

I want to say he was trying to refer "love" to the profession, but, well... it came out all wrong.

Friday, October 12, 2012

CAP Debates

The debates started as an interesting assignment but ended up as a real disappointment.

I cannot think of another assignment in which the work I put in could not in any way reflect my result. I'm not sulking about my grade, which wasn't terrible, but I'm frustrated by what high standards we were held to. We spent 30 minutes in NSL class listening to classical music about a river, and that was all the instruction we got on how to debate. Maybe a few minutes of pointers but we got no real practice.

To describe the effort I put in: I worked each minute we were given in class, including through the breaks, and spent most of my Friday after school preparing for the debate. Then I spent several hours on Sunday practicing speaking. I felt there was little more I could do. I clearly do not have a knack for debates, but got little help in school. Now my grade in each CAP class is taking a hit. I find that quite unfair.

I came in with a huge disadvantage, as my group was the first to go. As I watched later debates, I realized several aspects I could have done better, like citing my sources while speaking. Had I presented day two or three, I would have surely made adjustments. So why must I be held to tougher standards?

I'll be the first person to admit that I was far from perfect, but I had never participated in or watched a debate until the presidential one.
 
Last year we had interdisciplinary assignments, which were a nice way once a quarter to take a break from ordinary classes. The work we did was for the most part interesting, and was hardly monitored, much like the debates. The only difference between these two is that last year if one did his or her work and put in effort, an A was easily achievable. It was nice to have one grade in which our effort controlled the result. I expected the debates to be similar, and I was not lacking in effort. So I was left with the question: What could I have done?   

Saturday, September 22, 2012

5x5

 

Clip 1: Picked up my chemistry textbook.
Clip 2: Flipped to a (random) page.
Clip 3: Started doodling in the textbook.
Clip 4: Used the sky and moved the phone in a circle to represent my eyes drifting all over the place.
Clip 5: Threw my textbook on the ground.

I started my 5x5 by planning out my five shots. Using an iPhone, I first filmed my four shots in the same location. I then went outside to film the last one (Clip 4). Clip 1 was the most difficult to shoot, as I knew that I had to walk over to my textbook, pick it up, and place it on a table within five seconds without seeming rushed. The other four shots were not so difficult, as I only had one task. For the other four clips, I filmed for a minimum of 10 seconds, just in the event that I had a second or two at the beginning where nothing occurred. Out of those four, Clip 4 was the only abnormal one, as there was no particular beginning or end to the clip. So, I just spun in circles until I got dizzy. I then edited the 5x5 on iMovie '06 in just a few minutes. The issue I had was coming up with an idea because everything I that I thought of involved me being in it. I eventually resorted to searching for random objects until I found one that I thought would be a good centerpiece for a film.

I'm pleased with my 5x5, as just 6 hours ago I was sitting around with no inspiration. And by this point I was a little worried, as I had been brainstorming ideas throughout the week. The silent background made me pleased, though a little sound might have been better.

An idea for the next video challenge would be a similar assignment to the 5x5, except that each shot must be in a different location, while still keeping the plot intact. Finding a set is a difficult task in production, and this could help us improve at this aspect.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

1984 Trailer


1984, Michael Radford, R, 1984

1984 is about a man who lives in a totalitarian society, where he, and the rest of the residents, are under constant surveillance by Big Brother. Many do not appreciate his control, leading to an imminent rebellion.

While brainstorming movies with potentially intriguing trailers, I immediately thought of the novel we are reading in class, 1984. Though I had not seen a glimpse of the film until watching the trailer, I expected it to be dramatic, just like the novel and like I'm hoping our trailer will be.

The trailer is an exemplar of what I want to produce, as it focuses mostly on the dystopian setting, with a brief insight into the plot. Little dialogue amongst characters is used to illustrate the setting, and instead the trailer is narrated through characters' lines that serve as voice-overs. Also, we see Big Brother's face countless times. The repetition really helps the viewer understand how controlling this individual is. The viewer sees the main character writing in a journal, clearly against the laws of Big Brother. The most impressive cinematic technique used in the trailer, however, is the music. This dramatic tune runs throughout and it adds to imposing force of Big Brother. For my trailer, I plan on also having a dramatic tune throughout the trailer. I want it also to focus almost entirely on the setting and little on the plot and character development: what makes the society a dystopia. Finally, I don't think dialogue is necessary for a trailer, and a narration from voice-overs seems more appropriate. All of these plans could change while creating our script, but I'm definitely planning on using the 1984 trailer as a model.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

World Without Walls: Learning Well with Others

I read the article "World Without Walls: Learning Well with Others" written by Will Richardson on Edutopia. You can see my annotated page but for some reason there is also stuff highlighted... don't worry about that.

Anyway, onto the actual content. Richardson is attempting to persuade the reader that schools must embrace the advancement in technology. While he states that "face-to-face classrooms... are equally important in a connected world," he also makes it clear that the Internet can come of great use.

I do believe that a teacher is necessary, because, at least for me, learning from a teacher in-person is much easier than trying to search the Web for answers, as there is nothing like the reassurance of having a professional right by my side. My opinion could easily change someday.

He goes on to describe how a middle school class in California connects with one in Canada daily to work on projects together. He downplays some of the negative aspects of working on the Internet, such as the false information.

I'd love to learn script-writing techniques from experts. The creativity is loads of fun, because at this point in the production, there is little guidance. One thing I would need to learn is how to estimate the length of film through the script. Connected learning seems possible, as there are many Blogs out there, and some might pertain exactly to what we are learning. Ideas for films, whether it's the cinematography, the script, the costumes etc. can all be accessed on the Internet. I expect this to prove to be a great resource.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Movie Reviews


Marshall Fine of huffingtonpost.com created a movie review of the film "The Avengers," titled 
"Movie Review: The Avengers." Based on the opening line, "Here's the best thing I can say about The Avengers," I thought this review would be negative. I was completely wrong. Throughout this review, he generally describes the plot and the humor. For the humor, he compares it to other films. He describes the slapstick as "worthy of Chuck Jones in his Looney Tunes heyday." He does not touch on cinematic techniques, which most likely indicates that the purpose of this review was to mostly describe the plot. Judging by the praise Fine gives to the plot and humor, I'm sure he recommends the film.

For the quarterly movie review, I feel as though we should have certain requirements, but be able to focus in-depth on what stoop out to us most during the film. I don't think there should be a basic structure. If people want to write it all in the third-person that should be fine, and if people want to write it from their perspective in the first-person, that should be no problem either. 



Thursday, September 6, 2012

My First Post $$$

King Edward of Pike
This is a chicken.


My name is Ross and I'm in the second period film class at Blair High School. I spend a lot of my life outdoors, often playing soccer or biking. I used to own three hens, which resembled the chicken above. They're all dead now. In middle school and half of the first year of high school, I took film class. My favorite role was director and script writer. There are a couple of projects that stand out as my favorites.

The first one is a stop-motion project using props. One aspect I greatly enjoyed about the assignment is that there are many jobs needed to produce a interesting animation. In our group of four, we needed artistic people to create a scene; somebody experienced in stop-motion to direct the film; a script writer; an editor; an actor to do voice-overs; somebody to command the camera; and somebody to pick out sounds and music. Obviously, each group-member had to assume multiple jobs.

At Blair, the class did a news project in the TV studio. This project required group dynamics and each individual to do his or her job. Groups ranged from four to eight. Everyone had to write their own parts of the script, and one slacker could do serious harm to the entire production.

This Blog could come in handy when writing reflections, whether it's on an essay, movie project, or the change project. This way, we can see if other CAP students felt similarly about a project. For people in CAP we don't know so well, it would be interesting to see if we share similar views.