Total Pageviews

Translate

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Indoor Soccer


I am preparing to go to my Indoor Soccer game at the Rockville Sportsplex. Indoor soccer is very different from outdoor, which I play in the spring and fall. My MSI Classic team finished in 2nd place last outdoor, season, but are 1 and 2 so far indoors. We are playing against college students, so our struggles are probably justified.

Indoor soccer is a way faster game than outdoor. But the main difference is the rules. First of all, there are no out of bounds unless the ball hits the high ceiling. The walls are not only used to keep the ball in play but also to serve as a way to pass. The fields are by estimate about 3/5 the size of a regulation field. The games are on fake turf and is played 6 on 6. Substitutions happen the same way as they do in hockey: during play, unlike outdoors when the play must be dead to make changes.

As you can see by the picture, the spectators can watch from either the ground floor or the second floor.

I'm mostly a field player but I do occasionally play goalie. They are both fun. This fast paced game forces me to be on alert every second I'm in the game. Also, it makes keeping possession much harder. There's rarely time to hold onto the ball and wait for teammates to get home. In a split second, an opponent will pick your pocket.

I've played indoor for five years now and the game has changed drastically over that time. For one thing, shots are much harder and with so few players on the field, players get many looks at goal. Also, players can kick the ball all the way across the field in the air.

The shortened field and the fast paced action lead to exciting and usually high-scoring games.

    


Monday, December 17, 2012

Documentary Review


The Presidents: Truman to Ford 1945-1977

As one can probably tell from the title, the documentary is about the presidencies from Truman to Ford.

Truman was not well known when he became vice-president, and was not too popular when he became president after Roosevelt’s death. Nonetheless, this Democrat was the president of the United States. Many people admired his willingness to act against the wishes of the people to do what he believed was best. Truman’s first decision was to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Many people respected him for doing so. Truman dealt with the struggle to fend off communism. He created the policy of containment. Truman also made steps to end racial segregation. He left office unpopular but in hindsight, many people appreciated him.

Dwight Eisenhower was an American military hero. He did not like how the U.S. handled the Korean War, so he decided to run for president as a Republican. The narrator called the slogan “We like Ike” as an American sentiment. Eisenhower started getting the U.S. involved in the Vietnam conflict. He sent money to South Vietnam. Eisenhower won reelection with ease. He got a heart attack that made him seem weak. When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik into space, many Americans thought America was losing out to the Soviet Union. Eisenhower, at the end of his presidency, lost some of his “grand-father figure.”

John F. Kennedy was a Democrat the youngest man ever elected president. His generation was the youth of America. Everyone loved Kennedy. He suffered from many illnesses. Kennedy had an open-door policy. His failure with the Bay of Pigs changed him as a president. His audacity led him to challenging the nation, saying that the U.S. would land a man on the moon by the end of the decade. Kennedy’s biggest decision came during the Cuban Missile Crisis. He ordered a naval blockade of Cuba, which turned out to be a good decision. Tragically Kennedy was murdered not even one three years into his presidency. Despite his shortened term, he is still a famous president. 

Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson was sworn into office and promised to fulfill Kennedy’s presidency. LBJ had an ego problem, and often overreacted. He had an “in-your-face” style. It was arguably a gesture of dominance. Johnson’s Great Society created many new laws. This included the Civil Rights Act. In domestic policies, many people respect him. But he lost lots of it because of how he escalated the war in Vietnam. He did try to reach peace with Vietnam at the end of his presidency, but it was too little too late. Under fire, Johnson decided not to run for reelection.

Richard Nixon did a lot of scheming to become president. Nixon, a Republican, pretended that he had a plan to end the war, but in reality, he was only trying to escalate it. He used his presidency to go after enemies and gain celebrity status. While Nixon lied and lied, Watergate started heating up. The House passed an article of impeachment, and resigned immediately. He was a good strategist but will always be seen as a criminal.

Gerald Ford, Nixon’s Republican vice-president, took over president for Nixon. He was an inexperienced president. He tried to aid South Vietnam, but Congress did not allow it. Ford will always be associated with Nixon, which resulted in him not getting reelected.

What stood out to me in this documentary were the cinematic aspects. There was some great B-roll footage, and I always felt engaged. They had interviews and never had the narrator speak over black and rarely even pictures. There was sometimes music over interviews, which made them a little more lively.

There were no dramatic aspects present in the film. All the viewer sees are B-rolls and interviews.

The literary aspects were also impressive in the documentary. The plot was very well organized, in that the director used the obvious organization given: the presidents in chronological order. This saved me potential confusion because I knew that until the next president was introduced, the film was still describing the same one. The story was told in the third-person, and in a very unbiased way. At times I was bothered by how they were a little too acknowledging of a president’s positives. The documentaries recap of Nixon, for example, included it saying something like, “He was a very strategic man.” From the events the film described, he lied a trillion times, he escalated the Vietnam War when he said he’d end it, and he resigned after being found a criminal. I don’t know how he deserves a positive concluding statement.

A voice over narration was used. We never saw the narrator, but he played a huge part in the documentary.

The documentary used the Ken Burns effect, but not like I’d ever seen it before. They zoomed all around a wide image focusing on each individual piece. I have to say, it was pretty cool.

I would recommend this documentary if one wants pure facts. For me, I liked the truths of it, but if it had been a little biased I probably would have preferred it. Whether or not it took a Liberal or Conservative stance, I would have still been able to see a viewpoint. From this video, all I got were facts, given in a very enticing manner.  

 

Friday, December 14, 2012

Documentary Project

I'm working with Jacob and Jasper on a documentary project about what we feel Obama should do about the conflict in the Israel-Palestine conflict. Out of the three of us, I'm definitely the least knowledgeable on the topic. But I am quickly learning, and have a better understanding of the current conflict as well as the history. I've made several note cards on Noodletools already.


I do have experience with documentaries as I made two in 8th grade, one on sleep, which I did with a group, and one on exercise, which I made on my own. I will be useful when it comes to the format of a short documentary.

We have a couple of interviews scheduled. One with Mr. Freeman and one with some dude who has prominence and some position that is hard to remember the name of.

Right now there's not much else to say. We're using Freeman's interview to help guide our script. Not my choice but I'm not going to argue against the other two who like that idea. Not a big deal, that approach should work fine.


Monday, December 10, 2012

I'm Stupid

I missed my post due by December 9th and I feel stupid.


It's a simple reflection due once a week and I blew it. This was unfortunate as well, because I had recently posted two or three posts that hadn't been graded. I guess that's luck of the draw. I hope this won't affect me in the long run because it was a mistake, and this was an exception to my normally consistent posts.

Remembering to do the assignment is key, so I've set two alarms for Friday and Sunday to remind me to post, just in case I forget, like in this instance. When I have an interesting post, I will probably not need the reminder. Last week I had an interesting topic on plagiarism and posted that immediately.

As I was going over ways to update my Blog, I found the "Monetize" setting. Should I do it??? If I kept this Blog running by the end of the century maybe I'll have some money sent in the mail. Can't say I'm a hit. Maybe it's because of posts like these.

Well... so long.


Tuesday, November 27, 2012

My First Experience With Copyright Infringment

Last year, at the end of units in U.S. History class, we had to do Student Initiated Assignments. We could choose any topic related to the unit we had just covered. Then we could put together any kind of presentation we wanted. At the end of the Gilded Age unit, I decided to make a short documentary video on Andrew Carnegie. It only included pictures, text slides, music, and voice overs, but doing research on Carnegie, capturing audio, and editing took around three hours as I recall. After I finished, I uploaded it to Youtube, sent the link to my teacher, and never returned to the video again...

That is, until Thanksgiving weekend, when I got a message from a stranger. The person wrote: "Hi There. Can you tell me what software you used to build your video? I am impressed and would like to use it too." At first I was very confused, because I didn't even realize I had allowed the public to view my video. Then it dawned on me that I had actually made an informative and reasonably catchy video that could benefit students trying to learn more about Carnegie, and others who are curious to see what people on Youtube have to say about him. For the first time in just over a year, I decided to check out my video. I watched it and realized that I had made it for entertainment purposes, so I created a couple of unnecessary text slides. While I was mocking my rather stupid intro, I looked down at my view count. I over nearly 450 views! While this is a tiny number relative to the millions some videos get, I haven't uploaded a video with nearly this many hits. 

Then I thought, This silly first ten seconds takes away from this otherwise interesting documentary. I remembered we were taught about a Youtube video editor in this class. I figured out this basic software in a couple minutes and removed a little from the beginning and end. The new edits are finalized and the old version can no longer be seen by anyone but me, I assumed. Here it is (by the way, hitting the "Like" button wouldn't hurt):



I wanted to see if my video would be high on the list of search results. First I searched "Andrew Carnegie" and I was able to find my video on the third page of results. Not bad, I'd say, considering that Andrew Carnegie is one of the most prominent figures in American history. Next I tried "Vertical Integration," where my video was fifth on the first page. Finally, I typed in "Andrew Carnegie Vertical Integration," and my video appeared first on the list. Right under it, however, was a video with a cover picture of stacks of money, a picture which looked awfully similar to the one I used in my video. I clicked on it, and sure enough, somebody reuploaded my video. This one came before the edits so if you want to see the outtakes, you may:


I messaged the user and requested that they take down the video, and I filed a copyright claim to Youtube. It did anger me that somebody would plagiarize my video and take credit for it, but at the same time, I do see it as a compliment because somebody thought it was good enough to want to take credit for. They seem to have been doing an Andrew Carnegie series based on their channel's videos. I filed this claim on Saturday, Novermber 24, so I expect Youtube to take action soon.

Update: So, as you probably saw, the video had been removed by Youtube! Too bad you won't get to see the intro now.

Sunday, November 18, 2012

CAP Congress


I will admit that while I did not have a blast during the week of CAP Congress, I thought I was a good learning experience. I realized how difficult it is for a bill to become a law. Even in CAP which seems to be almost entirely liberal, it was still not easy to pass bills. The food MOCWAS brought in on Wednesday represents the bigger idea that bill sponsors will do everything they can to get their bills passed. In Congress, it was difficult to do something with all six bills in two days. We did not really have time to focus on each word of each bill, but there were clearly loopholes, which swayed my vote. At least once I would have voted differently if more time had been spent improving the bill. I was bored because rarely was a vote in doubt, even on amendments. Nonetheless, I now have a better idea of how Congress works and how every little word in a bill can be subject to debate.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

The Real Fall













Today I biked on the Capital Crescent Trail and got a great chance to see fall. Too bad I didn't have any kind of camera with me, because it was a nice ride. I don't know if it's just me, but I feel as though trees are losing their leaves at a wide range of times. When I did my "Capture the Fall" video, I was having some difficulty finding many leaves. Some trees still had all their leaves. But then some had no leaves at all. In the areas with many trees, leaves were coming down everywhere, including on my head. In hindsight, this weekend would have probably been a better time to make my video.